History stays fragmented
Similar events sit across NCRs, complaints, audits and shared folders under inconsistent language.
LEFTFOUNDING MANUFACTURER PROGRAMMEProof Sprint · £2,950–£4,500
FLAGSHIP QUALITY HISTORY REVIEW
Stop starting every CAPA
from zero.
Start with the quality history your organisation already owns.
Find potentially related quality issues, previous actions and evidence gaps, then record the named reviewer's judgement before export.
ApprovalSource lineageRead-only start
CONTROLLED CAPA WORKFLOWHUMAN IN CONTROL
NEW QUALITY EVENTCNC dimensional varianceNCR-2026-0148
CAPA
INTELLIGENCE
INTELLIGENCE
POTENTIAL MATCHES24source-linked
EVIDENCE COVERAGE82%3 gaps flagged
DRAFT STATUSReadyfor investigator review
1
REQUIRED NEXT STEPInvestigator review and approval
REDUCEInvestigation administration
IMPROVEEvidence coverage and consistency
REVEALSimilar events and recurrence
RETAINHuman accountability
THE CUSTOMER PROBLEM
CAPA teams do not need
another blank form.
They need the relevant history, evidence and controlled documents brought together before scarce engineering time is lost searching for them.
Evidence varies by investigator
Preparation quality depends on experience, memory and the time available to search.
Administration delays action
CAPAs remain open while engineers reconstruct context that already exists somewhere in the business.
THE CONTROLLED WORKFLOW
From quality event to
review-ready investigation.
RepeatProof CAPA supports the preparation work around an investigation. It does not declare root cause, approve disposition or close the CAPA.
Structure the event
Normalise the problem description and identify the affected product, process, supplier, equipment and site.
Retrieve relevant history
Find similar NCRs, complaints, audit findings, previous CAPAs and controlled documents.
Expose evidence gaps
Create an investigation plan and show which records, checks or interviews are still required.
Prepare the draft
Draft the problem statement, containment summary and testable hypotheses with every source attached.
Route for approval
The named investigator edits and approves an attachment-ready controlled output for the existing QMS.
CUSTOMER DELIVERABLES
Useful outputs.
Visible evidence.
Every engagement is designed around an agreed system of record and a named approval point.
Similar-event evidence pack
Relevant historical events, recurrence links and previous corrective actions with direct source references.
Download the sample evidence packInvestigation preparation pack
A structured problem statement, evidence request list and investigation plan for accountable review.
Controlled draft support
Containment and corrective-action drafting assistance clearly separated from authorised decisions.
Value and governance report
Measured improvement against baseline, user acceptance, source lineage and the production recommendation.
Download the ROI baseline worksheetFIXED-SCOPE VALUE PROOF
The 4–6 week
Founding Manufacturer Proof Sprint.
One site. One CAPA or NCR workflow. Approximately 250–1,000 usable historical records. Named reviewers. A clearly scoped engagement with a clear decision at the end. Download the one-page customer commitment estimate.
Baseline and controls
Confirm scope, success measures, approved history, accountable owners and review gates.
History preparation
Map 250–1,000 approved records into the controlled evidence structure.
Retrieval and named review
Configure related-history search and ranking, show why records surfaced and capture include, investigate further or exclude decisions.
Refine and verify
Confirm every source link, limitation, reviewer change and the agreed baseline comparison.
Outcome and next decision
Deliver the reviewed evidence, evaluation pack and proceed, change-scope or stop recommendation.
Included in the Proof Sprint
- Baseline and measurable value hypothesis
- Representative historical sample
- Related-event retrieval and why-surfaced explanations
- Source lineage and reviewer decisions
- Evidence-pack preparation and operating guide
- Measured closeout and recommendation
Deliberately outside the Proof Sprint
- Autonomous root-cause or disposition decisions
- Automatic CAPA closure or product release
- Replacement of the customer's QMS
- Multi-site or enterprise-wide rollout
- Unscoped data migration or systems integration
- Claims of compliance or certification
VALUE PROOF
Success is agreed
before configuration.
The Proof Sprint compares the controlled workflow with the customer's current baseline. No vague claims and no value declared without customer verification.
- 01Investigation preparation hours per event
- 02Retrieval precision and recall
- 03Top-5, Top-10 and Top-20 recall
- 04False-negative rate
- 05Reviewer agreement and correction reasons
Q+
GOVERNANCE BOUNDARY
Evidence supports judgement.
People remain accountable.
RepeatProof may retrieve history, flag evidence gaps and suggest testable hypotheses. It never declares root cause, approves disposition, closes CAPA or releases product.
Customer-approved sourcesLeast-privilege accessPrompt and version controlsRecorded approval
THE BUYING JOURNEY
Check. Prove.
Operate.
Begin with a free assessment, progress to a fixed-scope Proof Sprint and discuss production only when the measured closeout supports it.
Quality Memory Assessment
FreeThirty minutes to understand the problem, available history and credible next step.
Outcome: Fit, Possible Fit or Not Suitable Yet.Founding Manufacturer Proof Sprint
£2,950–£4,500Four to six weeks, one site, one workflow and approximately 250–1,000 usable records.
Fixed scope. Prices exclude VAT.Production deployment
Scoped after a successful Proof SprintMonitoring, support and a review cadence for a workflow that has earned the right to continue.
Record volume, workflows, sites and integrations determine production pricing.FREE 30-MINUTE ASSESSMENT
Could your CAPA history
support a useful first proof?
Submit your details and we will review the event volume, primary problem, likely data boundary and decision owner before the assessment.
No live integration requiredConfidential discussionClear fit outcome