Work through one realistic manufacturing case: inspect potentially related events, see why each record surfaced, review previous actions and evidence gaps, then record Accept, Maybe or Reject.
The case is invented to demonstrate the workflow, evidence lineage and decision boundaries. It is not evidence of customer savings, recurrence reduction or CAPA effectiveness.
Run a controlled synthetic example. RepeatProof searches the approved history, explains why each record surfaced and asks a quality professional to Accept, mark Maybe or Reject it.
Final inspection measured the bore diameter at 25.13 mm against an approved specification of 25 ±0.05 mm.
above the upper specification limit
Potentially related records
Why each record surfaced
Previous actions and evidence
Select Find related history to prepare the synthetic review.
A credible result should show the current problem, source-linked related history, why each item surfaced, available and missing effectiveness evidence, reviewer labels and an evidence pack that can be reconstructed.
Similarity supports retrieval. It does not declare that two events share a root cause.
Matching product, process, machine, failure mode or controlled reference remains visible.
The authorised reviewer accepts, marks maybe or rejects each item before it enters the evidence pack.
The free 30-minute assessment determines Fit, Possible Fit or Not Suitable Yet.