Work through one realistic manufacturing case: let RepeatProof search and rank the approved history, inspect why each event surfaced, investigate recurring factors and decide which evidence to include.
This demonstration uses invented manufacturing records designed to reflect a realistic quality workflow. It contains no customer information.
See RepeatProof search approved history, rank potentially related events, explain every result and surface recurring factors before a quality professional decides what evidence to rely upon.
Final inspection measured the bore diameter at 25.13 mm against an approved specification of 25 ±0.05 mm.
above the upper specification limit
Search approved historical records
Rank and explain potential matches
Surface recurring factors for review
Select Search approved history to run the representative workflow.
Use the short narrated review for a guided walkthrough, then download the same representative evidence pack for a closer internal review.
See potentially related history, why each record surfaced, the evidence gaps and the point where a named person must decide.
Open or download MP4 ↗ · Open captions/transcriptReview the source trail, relationship scores, evidence-reliance decisions, limitations and QMS handback format.
Download the sample pack ↗Follow the current problem, source-linked related history, why each item surfaced, available and missing effectiveness evidence, reviewer labels and the reconstructable evidence pack.
Similarity supports retrieval. It does not declare that two events share a root cause.
Matching product, process, machine, failure mode or controlled reference remains visible.
The authorised reviewer includes, investigates further or excludes each item before the evidence pack is prepared.
The free 30-minute assessment determines Fit, Possible Fit or Not Suitable Yet.