Investigations start from zero
Quality and Engineering teams manually search QMS records, spreadsheets, shared folders and documents looking for similar previous problems.
RepeatProof turns fragmented quality history into searchable organisational Quality Memory. It connects approved NCR, CAPA and complaint history so your team can find what happened before without hours of manual searching.
Your people make the decisions. RepeatProof finds the evidence.
When the next issue arrives, useful evidence may already exist. The difficulty is finding it across different systems, language and years of accumulated records.
Quality and Engineering teams manually search QMS records, spreadsheets, shared folders and documents looking for similar previous problems.
The same failure can be described differently across NCRs, complaints and CAPAs, making recurrence difficult to recognise.
Corrective actions, effectiveness evidence and lessons learned can disappear into historical records or leave with experienced employees.
RepeatProof searches the approved historical boundary, explains why records surfaced and prepares the evidence for review. Your QMS remains authoritative.
AI searches the approved quality history and brings potentially related events into one review.
Related failures, previous CAPAs, complaints and corrective actions can be surfaced even when terminology differs.
Previous actions, evidence and organisational learning are available to the next investigator.
Less time searching. More time investigating, improving and preventing recurrence.
Follow one representative NCR from the first search to a source-linked evidence pack. The example illustrates the workflow; every suggested relationship remains subject to human review.
Current issue enters a controlled historical review.
RepeatProof helps skilled Quality and Engineering people recover time and use the organisation's existing learning more effectively.
Spend less Quality and Engineering time searching historical records and more time investigating and improving.
Connect potentially related failures across NCRs, complaints and CAPAs that might otherwise remain isolated.
Make previous actions and evidence accessible even when experienced employees move roles or leave.
RepeatProof doesn't replace your Quality team. It gives them more time and better evidence to do the work that requires their judgement.
Begin with a free assessment, test the proposition in a bounded proof and discuss ongoing use only when the evidence supports it.
A 30-minute conversation to review your history, current investigation burden and whether a focused proof is credible.
One site, one workflow and approximately 250–1,000 records. Measure retrieval quality, time saved and evidence readiness.
Discuss a governed operating model only if the evidence supports continuation. Proceed, change the scope or stop.
Share your company, sector, event volume and primary problem. Optional data context helps us assess the likely historical boundary faster.