Records in scope
- Customer complaints and deviations
- Corrective-action records
- Inspection and audit findings
- Line, product and supplier references
LEFTFOUNDING MANUFACTURER PROGRAMMEProof Sprint · £2,950–£4,500
FOOD QUALITY HISTORY
Bring repeat deviations, complaints and corrective actions into one review.
A bounded history-review path for recurring quality events across lines, products, sites and suppliers while food-safety and release decisions stay with authorised teams.
View all industry examples ↗DATA STATUSIllustrative onlyQMS STATUSAuthoritativeCUSTOMER OUTCOMENot claimedQUALITY DECISIONSHuman-owned
Illustrative workflow — not customer data or a customer result.
This scenario describes a possible workflow using no customer records. Terminology, obligations and approval authorities must be checked against the manufacturer's products, markets and controlled procedures.
THE SITUATION
A recognisable starting point.
Not a promised result.
A recurring pack-integrity complaint may relate to earlier line deviations and supplier actions. Records are spread across complaint, audit and corrective-action histories and use inconsistent descriptions.
What the team needs to know
Which previous events deserve review, what actions were recorded, and what evidence is available to assess whether the issue has recurred?
What RepeatProof can prepare
- Related-history shortlist with visible match reasons
- Cross-record action and evidence summary
- Missing-data and verification prompts
- Reviewer decisions ready for controlled handback
Decision boundary
RepeatProof does not make food-safety, HACCP, withdrawal, recall, disposition, release or corrective-action closure decisions. The customer’s approved systems and authorised people remain authoritative.
CONTROLLED PATH
From approved export
to governed handback.
Each stage has an owner and a visible boundary. Exact fields, systems, permissions and retention are agreed before data is exchanged.
Confirm the question
A named quality owner defines the current issue, records in scope and decisions that remain outside RepeatProof.
Check data readiness
Required fields, record counts, date coverage, missing values and source ownership are checked before analysis.
Prepare related history
Versioned rules surface potentially related records with source references, match reasons, confidence and limitations.
Review and hand back
An authorised person records Accept, Maybe or Reject and returns the approved evidence pack to the controlled customer process.
Confirm your real
workflow boundary.
The assessment checks whether your history is suitable and identifies the smallest credible first proof. It does not require a live QMS integration.