Records in scope
- Nonconformance and NCR records
- CAPA and corrective-action records
- Concession or deviation history
- Supplier and process references
LEFTFOUNDING MANUFACTURER PROGRAMMEProof Sprint · £2,950–£4,500
AEROSPACE QUALITY HISTORY
Trace recurring escapes across NCR, concession and CAPA history.
A governed review path for quality teams investigating repeat nonconformance across parts, processes, suppliers and controlled corrective-action records.
View all industry examples ↗DATA STATUSIllustrative onlyQMS STATUSAuthoritativeCUSTOMER OUTCOMENot claimedQUALITY DECISIONSHuman-owned
Illustrative workflow — not customer data or a customer result.
This scenario describes a possible workflow using no customer records. Terminology, obligations and approval authorities must be checked against the manufacturer's products, markets and controlled procedures.
THE SITUATION
A recognisable starting point.
Not a promised result.
A dimensional escape has appeared again on a critical machined feature. The current record uses different wording from earlier events, and the investigator needs to know whether previous containment or corrective action is relevant.
What the team needs to know
Which earlier records may be relevant to this investigation, why did they surface, and what effectiveness evidence is still missing?
What RepeatProof can prepare
- Source-linked related-history shortlist
- Visible reasons each record surfaced
- Previous action and effectiveness-evidence summary
- Accept, Maybe or Reject decisions for the named reviewer
Decision boundary
RepeatProof does not decide airworthiness, conformity, concession, release, root cause or CAPA closure. The approved aerospace quality process and authorised people retain every decision.
CONTROLLED PATH
From approved export
to governed handback.
Each stage has an owner and a visible boundary. Exact fields, systems, permissions and retention are agreed before data is exchanged.
Confirm the question
A named quality owner defines the current issue, records in scope and decisions that remain outside RepeatProof.
Check data readiness
Required fields, record counts, date coverage, missing values and source ownership are checked before analysis.
Prepare related history
Versioned rules surface potentially related records with source references, match reasons, confidence and limitations.
Review and hand back
An authorised person records Accept, Maybe or Reject and returns the approved evidence pack to the controlled customer process.
Confirm your real
workflow boundary.
The assessment checks whether your history is suitable and identifies the smallest credible first proof. It does not require a live QMS integration.